NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2001] ATPR (Digest) 46-210
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : City of Botany Bay Council v Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) [2001] NSWCA 94 revised - 03/05/2007 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40159/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/10/00, 24/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 April 2001
PARTIES : City of Botany Bay Council (Appellant) Jazabas Pty Limited (ACN 060 105 053) (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Beazley JA at 101; Fitzgerald JA at 106
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT 55043/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Rolfe J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M. Tobias QC / A. Galasso (Appellant) B. Rayment QC / D.T. Kell (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox (Appellant) Segal Litton & Chilton (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Local authority - misstatements to prospective purchaser concerning development potential of land - negligence - misleading and deceptive conduct - damages - D Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act 1986 Supreme Court Act 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Mutual Life and Citizens' Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1968) 122 CLR 556 CASES CITED: Ruby v March (1975) 132 CLR 642 Tepko Pty Ltd v Water Board [2001] HCA 19 DECISION : Appeal upheld. Orders made by Rolfe J on 14 March 2000 set aside and in lieu thereof judgment for the defendant with costs. Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and have a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act, if qualified. Cross appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate