NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v TJH [2001] NSWCCA 433 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60831/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 October 2001
PARTIES : Regina TJH JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Grove J at 45
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/51/0126 & 99/21/1130 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Gibson DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C: Ms D. Woodburne A: Mr A Haesler SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor D J Humphreys CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - appeals - appeal against sentence - whether sentence manifestly excessive - aggravated sexual assault - indecent sexual assault - sexual offences against children - failure to complete Cedar Cottage programme - whether correct starting point for sentence - whether accumulation of sentence appropriate - no error of sentencing principle - whether sentencing Judge took too narrow view of special circumstances in not finding such circumstances to exist - inappropriate for court to embark upon settling manner of sentencing principle as to what may be special circumstances - that issue is reserved for a five judge bench. Crimes Act 1900 ss 61D(1), 61D(1A), 61E, 61J, 61M LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6 Per-trial Diversion of Offenders Act 1985, s 33 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60831/00 WOOD CJ AT CL GROVE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate