NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Batistatos v RTA of NSW & Anor [2000] NSWSC 506 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 21033/94 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 June 2000
Andrew Batistatos by his tutor Nita Lavina Batistatos (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (First Defendant)
Newcastle City Council (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr G R Graham (Plaintiff)
COUNSEL : Mr W M Robinson (First Defendant)
Mr M Joseph SC (Second Defendant) Mr T D Kelly (Plaintiff)
Mr G Ball SOLICITORS : Crown Solicitor's Office (First Defendant)
Phillips Fox (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Summary judgment Local Government Act 1919 - s 580 LEGISLATION CITED : Lunacy Act 1898 Supreme Court Rules - Part 13 r 5 Notice of Action and Other Privileges Abolition Act No 19 of 1977 - s 3 Air Services Australia v Zarb (NSWSC unreported, 26 August 1998) Dey v Victoria Railway Commissioners (1948-49) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED : Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Knight v Concord Municipal Council & Ors [1970] 3 NSWLR 295 Buckle v Bayswater Road (1963) 57 CLR 259 Field v Council of the Municipality of Mosman [1937] 54 WN 162 DECISION : See para 24
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate