NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Dachser v Waco [2000] NSWSC 1049 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50070/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/10/00, 19/10/00, 20/10/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 November 2000
PARTIES : Dachser GmbH & Co KG - Plaintiff Waco Australia Pty Limited - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Rolfe J
COUNSEL : Mr I.M. Jackman/Ms N. Obrart - Plaintiff Mr I.M. Neil - Defendant SOLICITORS : Clayton Utz - Plaintiff Schweizer & Co - Defendant CATCHWORDS : Whether the plaintiff has standing to bring these proceedings in New South Wales by reason of the application of Swiss law. Held it did not. - Applicability of foreign law considered. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules United States Surgical Corporation v Hospital Products International Pty Limited & ors (1982) 2 NSWLR 766 Clarke v The Earl of Dunraven and Mount-Earl [1897] AC 59 (The "Satanita") In Re Recher's Will Trusts [1972] 1 Ch 526 CASES CITED : Finlayson v Carr [1978] 1 NSWLR 657 Scruples Imports Pty Limited v Crabtree & Evelyn Pty Limited [1983] 1 IPR 315 Temilkovski v Australian Iron and Steel Pty Limited (1966) 67 SR (NSW) 211 Subbotovsky v Waung (1968) 72 SR (NSW) 242 DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
I N D E X
PARA
Introduction 1
The WACO System Constituent Documents 7
The Issues 19
Whether The Plaintiff Lacks Standing To Bring These Proceedings 33
The Applicable Law 39
Submissions On Behalf Of The Parties 91
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate