NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Kerr v Commissioner of Police & Ors [2001] NSWSC 637 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10407/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 July 2001, 26 July 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 July 2001
Nathan Anthony Kerr (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Commisioner of Police for the State of New South Wales (1st Defendant) State of New South Wales (2nd Defendant) Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (3rd Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J
A.C. Haesler (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : P.F. Singleton (1st & 2nd Defendants) M.C. Grogan (3rd Defendant) Nikola Velcic & Associates (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : I.V. Knight (1st & 2nd Defendants) S.E. O'Connor (3rd Defendant) CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - Summons for declaration and orders - forensic samples taken from suspect - suspicion of crime of murder - whether forensic procedure undertaken illegally - whether court should now make order restraining testing of samples - whether court should now order destruction of samples - exercise of discretion - Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 considered. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 Ousley v The Queen (1997) 94 ACrimR 195 George v Rockett (1980) 170 CLR 104 Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 CASES CITED : Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 Anderson v Attorney General for New South Wales (1987) 10 NSWLR 198 Yates v Wilson (1989) 168 CLR 339 Sergi v DPP (unreported, NSWCA, 10 September 1991) Tye v The Commissioner of Police (1995) 84 ACrimR 147 DECISION : See para 66
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate