NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Perkovic v SRA of NSW [2001] NSWSC 591 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20303/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/05/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 June 2001
PARTIES : Damir Perkovic v The State Rail Authority of New South Wales JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J
Mr I Wales SC; Mr R Moyle - plaintiff COUNSEL : Mr J Dodd - defendant Mr P Singleton - For Ministry of Justice WA Lough & Wells Wollongong - For plaintiff
Dibbs Crowther & Osborne SOLICITORS : Sydney - For defendant
I V Knight NSW Crown Solicitor As Agent for Western Australian Crown Solicitor - For Ministry of Justice WA CATCHWORDS : Subpoena - Objection to production of documents - Test - Run-of-the mill cases - Routine documents - Public interest immunity - Practice - Procedure - Inspection of documents by judge Waind v Hill and National Employers Mutual General Association Ltd (1978) 1 NSWLR 372 Air Canada v Secretary of Trade (1983) 2 AC 394 Alister v Regina (1983-1984) 154 CLR 404 at 414 and 456 Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (1980) AC 1090 CASES CITED : Glasgow Corporation v Central Land Board (1956) SC (HL) 1 Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v Peruvian Guano Co (1882) 11 QBD 55 Commissoner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR 564 Sankey v Whitlam (1978) 142 CLR 1 at 38-39 Conway v Rimmer (1968) AC 910 at 987 R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14 DECISION : Production of documents ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate