NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 52 NSWLR 301 124 A Crim R 371
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Stewart [2001] NSWCCA 260 revised - 10/09/2001 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60523/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/05/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 September 2001
PARTIES : Regina v Malcolm James Stewart JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Hulme J at 34; Howie J at 50
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 999/41/0214 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Garling DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P.G. Berman SC - Crown A.P. Cook - Applicant SOLICITORS : S.E. O'Connor - Crown South Eastern Aboriginal Legal Service - Applicant CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Summing up - warning to jury under s 165 of the Evidence Act - evidence of a 'kind' that may be unreliable Crimes Act 1900 - s 112(2) Evidence Act 1995 - ss 38, 66, 108(3), 116(1) 164, 165 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 - s 108 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 - s 5DA Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 - s 23 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44 Kelleher v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 534 Davies v DPP [1954] AC 378 Hargan v The King (1919) 27 CLR 13 Reg v Spencer [1986] AC 128 Chamberlain v the Queen (No. 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521 Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 R v Weston [1924] VLR 166 Mcnee v Kay [1953] VLR 520 Spencer [1986] AC 128 Hester [1973] AC 296 Carr v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 314 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 R v Murray 91987) 11 NSWLR 12 Crampton v The Queen (2000) 75 ALJR 133 McKinney and Judge v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 468 R v Lewis (NSWCCA, 8 September 1998) R v King [2000] NSWCCA 507 R v Kirby [2000] NSWCCA 330 R v Johnson (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 Lowe (1997) 98 A Crim R 300- R v Spedding (NSWCCA, unreported, 11 December 1997) Vetrovec v The Queen [1982] 67 CCC (2d) 1 R v Flood [1999] NSWCCA 198 R v Taranto [1999] NSWCCA 396 R v AGJ (NSWCCA, 30 October 1997) Lane v R (1996) 66 FCR 144 Williams (1999) 104 A Crim R 260 Covill (2000) 114 A Crim R 111 CASES CITED: R v Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 Lane v the Queen (1996) 66 FCR 144 R v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282 R v Barnes (NSWCCA, 1 December 1998) Benecke (1999) 106 A Crim R 282 R v Mayberry [2000] NSWCCA 531 Driscoll v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 517 Morris v the Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454 R v TJF [2001] NSWCCA 127 R v Lonie and Groom [1999] NSWCCA 19 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 Azzopardi and Davis v The Queen [2001] 75 ALJR 931 R v Fernando [1999] NSWCCA 66 R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155 R v Stanton (NSWCCA, 24 July 1998, unreported) R v McLachlan [1999] 2 VR 553 R v Kendrick [1997] 2 VR 699 Downey (1997) 97 A Crim R 41 Ware (1994) 73 A Crim R 17 Wood v R [2001] NSWCCA 228 R v Spedding (NSWCCA, 11 December 1997) R v Paek [1999] NSWCCA 184 Checconi (1988) 34 A Crim R 160 R v Chai (1992) 27 NSWLR 153 R v Roddom [2001] NSWCCA 168 Pollitt v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 558 Conway v R [2000] 98 FCR 204 R v JGW [1999] NSWCCA 116 R v Richards (NSWCCA, 3 April 1998) R v Blackman and Walters [2001] NSWCCA 121 R v Speeding [2001] NSWCCA 105 DECISION : Appeal against conviction is dismissed. Application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted but the appeal is dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate