NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Proctor & Gamble v Medical Research [2001] NSWSC 183 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50021/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 7.2.01, 13.2.01 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2001
PARTIES : Proctor & Gamble Australia Pty Limited -v- Medical Research Pty Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Hunter J
COUNSEL : Applicant/Defendant: A J Sullivan QC Respondent/Plaintiff: T J Hancock & C Champion SOLICITORS : Applicant/Defendant : Blake Dawson Waldron Respondent/Plaintiff: Colin Biggers & Paisley CATCHWORDS : Practice & procedure - sufficiency of discovery - conclusiveness of affidavit verifying discovery. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Geoffrey Hill & Associates -v- King (1992) 27 NSWLR 228 Mulley -v- Manifold (1959) 103 CLR 341 Falk -v- Finlay (1999) NSWSC 1284 (unreported) CASES CITED : Lyell v Kennedy [No. 3] (1884) 27 Ch D 1 Fruehauf Finance -v- Zurich Australian Insurance (1990) 20 NSWLR 359 Lonrho Ltd v Shell Petroluem Company (No 2) [1980] 1 WLR 627 Linfa Pty Ltd -v- Citibank Ltd [1995] 1 VR 643 Taylor -v- Santos Ltd (1998) 71 SASR 434 DECISION : Application dismissed. Respondent to pay applicant's costs of application other than costs of 13 February 2001 as to which no order for costs is made.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION COMMERCIAL LIST
HUNTER J
WEDNESDAY 21 MARCH 2001
50021/00 PROCTOR & GAMBLE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD -v- MEDICAL RESEARCH PTY LTD
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate