New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 146 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 March 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 March 2000 JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff) PARTIES : v AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J I Barker Q.C. M R Hall (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : W H Nicholas Q.C. R Stitt Q.C. J S Wheelhouse (Defendant) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Regarding Plaintiff's subpoena to the Police Service of 9 March 2000 in connection with unedited documents - T4751 DECISION : See paragraph 4 DLJT: 112 (Ex Tempore - Revised) [2000] NSWSC 146 THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996 JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE MONDAY 13 MARCH 2000 JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff) v AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant) JUDGMENT (Regarding plaintiff's subpoena to the Police Service of 9 March 2000 in connection with unedited documents - T4751) 1 HIS HONOUR: On 9 March 2000 the solicitors for the plaintiff served a subpoena on the Police Service. That subpoena sought three specific documents in an unedited form. Inspection of the edited documents has taken place. 2 By affidavit sworn 9 March, Deputy Commissioner Moroney advanced a claim for public interest immunity. In the usual way a confidential affidavit has been sworn by another officer, to which is annexed some confidential exhibits. I have had regard to the contents of the confidential material. 3 That which the Police Service asserts to be excluded from production falls clearly within an accepted class of material protected by public interest immunity. The plaintiff, conformably with usual practice and the nature of the Commissioner's claim, made no submissions in support of access and in opposition to the claim. 4 I decline to make any order for costs of the Commissioner, in accordance with the rather confused form of Notice of Motion filed in connection with this application. The only order I make is to decline inspection. The documents produced are returned immediately to the Commissioner. *********** Last Modified: 09/25/2000 DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.