NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Fexuto Pty Limited v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited & Ors (No 2) [2001] NSWCA 115 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40898/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 20/04/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 April 2001
Fexuto Pty Limited (Appellant/Claimant) (Respondents/Opponents) Bosnjak Holdings Pty Limited Slavko James Joseph Bosnjak Carol Lynette Bosnjak Feyama Pty Limited Fexule Pty Limited National Bus Company Pty Limited Torsby Pty Limited Flaren Pty Limited PARTIES : Bosnjak Property Developments Pty Limited Westbus Pty Limited Bosnjak Investments Pty Limited Bosnjak Coach Lines Pty Limited St Mary's Bus Services Pty Limited Parramatta Bus Company Pty Limited Bosnjak Bros Pty Limited Bosnjak Enterprises Pty Limited Bosnjak Internatinal Sales Pty Limited Smithfield Coach Imports Pty Limited Westbus(UK) Limited JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT ED 3799/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Young J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
V F Kerr (Appellant/Claimant) COUNSEL : T Jones, Solicitor (1, 9-20 Respondents/Opponents) M Pembroke (2-8 Respondents/Opponents) Piper Alderman (Appellant/Claimant) SOLICITORS : Freehill, Hollingdale & Page (1, 9-20 Respondents/Opponents) Atanaskovic Hartnell (2-8 Respondents/Opponents) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE - no variation of orders - matter not raised during hearing - Supreme Court Rules, Part 40, Rule 9 DECISION : The Notice of Motion is dismissed. The Claimant should pay the Opponent's costs of the Notice of Motion.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate