NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 A Crim R 66
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS v NICHOLLS [2001] NSWSC 523 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10803/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 May 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 June 2001
Director of Public Prosecutions (Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
Mark Richard Nicholls (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Carney LCM JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr P I Lakatos (Plaintiff) Mr J S Stratton (Defendant) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Plaintiff) Mr A E Townsden (Legal Aid Commission) Defendant CATCHWORDS : Lawful arrest - whether necessary to intend to take suspect before a justice - effect of Part 10A, Crimes Act 1900, exercise of discretion to exclude evidence under s 138 Evidence Act 1995 - meaning of "reckless" - Identification - photograph identified long after observation - whether witness' evidence of prior identification by him is hearsay - applicability of ss 59, 62 of the Evidence Act 1995 Justices Act 1092 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1997 Bozatsis & Spanakakis (1997) 97 A Crim R 296 R v Lissof, unreported, NSWCCA 23 November 1999 CASES CITED : R v Pera, unreported, NSWCCA 17 March 2000 Williams v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 278 Barbaro & Rovere [2000] 112 A Crim R 551 R v Taousanis [2001] NSWSC 74 DECISION : Summons dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate