NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 127 A Crim R 290
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v V Camilleri [2001] NSWCCA 527 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60520/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/07/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 December 2001
PARTIES : Regina Victor Camilleri JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Dowd J at 2; Kirby J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0891 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL McGuire DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L M B Lamprati (Resp/Crown) T A Game SC (App) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Resp/Crown) LMG Solicitors (App) CATCHWORDS : Circumstantial evidence direction - Voice identification warning - Need to include matters affecting reliability of identification - Inferences arising from Counsels conduct of cross examination - Need for circumspection when drawing inference LEGISLATION CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 Grant v The Queen (1975) 11 ALR 503 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Green v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 28 R v Hodge (1838) 2 Lewin CC 227 Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619 CASES CITED: Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234 Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 Domican v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 555 R v Birks (1990) 19 NSWLR 677 Abdallah v The Queen [2001] NSWCCA 506 R v Manunta (1989) 54 SASR 17 DECISION : Ref para 78
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate