NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [2000] NSWSC 96 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 February 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 February 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant)
POLICE SERVICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES (On Subpoena) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
I Barker Q.C. M R Hall (Plaintiff)
COUNSEL : R Stitt Q.C. J S Wheelhouse (Defendant)
P Lakatos (Police Service) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Defendant)
Crown Solicitors Office (Police Service - on subpoena) CATCHWORDS : On application by Police Service of New South Wales for Public Interest immunity in respect of documents under subpoena - T4294 DECISION : See paragraph 6
DLJT: 102 (Ex Tempore - Revised) [2000] NSWSC 96
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
FRIDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2000
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant)
POLICE SERVICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES (On Subpoena)
JUDGMENT (On application by Police Service of NSW for Public Interest Immunity in respect of documents under subpoena - T4294)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate