NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Eric & Valerie Coffey & Ors v Fernbank Management Pty Ltd & Anor [2001] NSWSC 192 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2985 of 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13 October and 11, 12 and 13 December 2000, 23 March 2001 and 4 April 2001. JUDGMENT DATE : 23 April 2001
Eric Coffey & Valerie L Coffey (First Plaintiffs/First Cross Defendants as representatives of the Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) PARTIES : Fernbank Management Pty Ltd (First Defendant/Cross Claimant) Fernbank Developments Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Bergin J
COUNSEL : S Robb QC/M Meek (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) R McDougall QC/MD Young (Defendants/Cross Claimant) SOLICITORS : Stewart Cuddy & Mockler (Plaintiffs/Cross Defendants) Tress Cocks & Maddox (Defendants/Cross Claimant) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - Previous Court of Appeal finding that "web" of agreements of no force or effect - Whether an agreement executed subsequently purporting to replace one of the agreements in the web renders other agreements enforceable. - ESTOPPEL - Whether plaintiffs estopped by reason of demands on defendant to provide services under the Agreements and defendants providing those services. - RESTITUTION - Nature of determination - Fair and just remuneration - Whether application of fee stipulated in unenforceable agreements is just - Whether other methods of assessment applicable. LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Barry v Heider (1914) 19 CLR 197 Brambles Holdings Limited v Bathurst City Council [2001] NSWCA 61, 23 March 2001 Codelfa Constructions Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1981-1982) 149 CLR 337 Davis v Mortgage Acceptance Nominees Limited NSWSC Rolfe J unreported, 20 April 1994 CASES CITED : Gillett & Ors v Halwood Corporation Ltd & Ors NSWSC Rolfe J unreported 25 July 1995 Gillett v Halwood Corporation Ltd & Ors NSWCA, unreported, 26 March 1998 Hungerfords & Ors v Walker & Ors (1990) 171 CLR 125 Pavey & Matthews Pty Ltd v Paul (1987) 162 CLR 221 [Mason & Carter Restitution Law in Australia. Butterworths (1995)] DECISION : Declarations in favour of plaintiffs on Statement of Claim. Orders in favour of Cross Defendant on Cross Claim for fee stipulated in unenforceable Agreement.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate