NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 35 ACSR 484
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Global Television v Sportsvision Australia (in liq.) & 2 Ors [2000] NSWSC 960 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3055/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/08/00, 18/08/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 October 2000
Global Television Pty Limited (ACN 010 122 611) (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) PARTIES : Sportsvision Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 068 170 945) (First Defendant) Kenneth John Rennie (Second Defendant/First Cross-Claimant) Optus Vision Pty Limited (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
B A Coles, QC/M J Leeming (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) COUNSEL : J C Sheahan, SC/P Russell (First and Second Defendants/First Cross-Claimant) I M Jackman (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) Speed and Stracey (Plaintiff/First Cross-Defendant/Second Cross-Defendant) SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron (First and Second Defendants/First Cross-Claimant) Minter Ellison (Third Defendant/Second Cross-Claimant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS LAW — Does recourse to guarantee survive liquidator's disclaimer of contract guaranteed taking into account s568D(1) of the Corporations Law — Effectiveness of disclaimer — Meaning of "unprofitable contract" — Challenge to disclaimer on basis of disproportionate prejudice. Bankruptcy Act 1869 (Imp) s23 LEGISLATION CITED : Bankruptcy Act of 1883 s55(2) Corporations Law Division 7A of Pt 5.6; s568(1), (1A); s568B(2), (3); s568D(1), (2); s568F; s1321 Arthur Hill v East & West India Dock Co (1884) 9 App Cas 448 Christopher Moran Holdings Ltd v Bairstow [1999] 2 WLR 396 Dekala Pty Limited (in liq) v Perth Land and Leisure Ltd (1989) 17 NSWLR 664 Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd [1997] AC 70 McDonald v Dennys Lascelles (1933) 48 CLR 457 Manning v Flight (1832) 3 B & Ad 211, 110 ER 29 Re Middle Harbour Investments Limited [1977] 2 NSWLR 652 Re the Nottingham General Cemetery Co [1953] Ch 683 CASES CITED : Old Style Confections Pty Ltd v Microbyte Investments Pty Ltd (in liq) [1995] 2 VR 457 Rothwells Ltd v Spedley Securities Limited (1990) 20 NSWLR 417 Sandtara Pty Limited v Abigroup Pty Limited (1996) 14 ACLC 888 Smith v North (1872) LR 7 Exch 242 Stacey v Hill [1901] 1 QB 660 Stubbs Investments Ltd v Thorp [1997] 1 NZLR 310 [CA1955(NZ) S243 1992] Transmetro Corporation Ltd v Real Investments Pty Ltd (1999) 17 ACLC 1314 Ex parte Walton in re Levy (1881) 17 ChD 746 Yeoman Credit Ltd v Latter [1961] 1 WLR 828 DECISION : Guarantee survives though disclaimer effective.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate