NSW Caselaw
(2001) 28 Fam LR 142 Reported Decision : [2001] NSWSC 408 [2001] ACL Rep 205 NSW 18 (2001) DFC 95-235
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Vitali v Stachnik [2001] NSWSC 408 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1484/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/04/01, 18/04/01, 19/04/01, 20/04/01, 24/04/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 May 2001
PARTIES : Johan Hendrik Vitali - Plaintiff Elizabeth Joanna Stachnik - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
COUNSEL : Mr B.J. Knox - Plaintiff Ms L.M. Snelling - Defendant SOLICITORS : Elrington Boardman Allport - Plaintiff Claire & Associates - Defendant CATCHWORDS : FAMILY LAW - De facto relationships - Adjustment of interests in property - Contributions by one party to business of company solely owned by other - Debt and other contract claims should not be left to be separately litigated - Need for proceedings to produce finality in all aspects of relationship - Order for payment made - Proceedings separately maintainable barred LEGISLATION CITED : Property (Relationships) Act 1984 Price v Clinton [2000] NSWSC 1041 Wakeford v Ellis (1998) DFC 95-202 CASES CITED : Evans v Marmont (1997) 42 NSWLR 70 Dwyer v Kaljo (1987) 11 FamLR 785 Black v Black (1991) DFC 95-113 DECISION : Orders for payment of money and delivery of property by defendant to plaintiff. Orders restraining parties from suing upon other causes of action arising from relationship. Order that defendant pay plaintiff's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate