NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : PROKART RACING P/L v SHAKYA [2001] NSWCA 409 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40623/00; HEARING DATE(S) : 12.11.01 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 November 2001
PARTIES : Prokart Racing Pty Limited T/as Prokart Racing - Claimant/Cross Opponent Raju Shakya - Opponent/Cross Claimant JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 2; Bryson J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 8446/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sidis DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C.R. Hoeben SC/P. Stockley - Claimant/Cross-Opponent A.J. McInerney - Opponent/Cross-Claimant SOLICITORS : Curwood & Partners - Claimant/Cross-Opponent Andrew Fegent & Company - Opponent/Cross-Claimant CATCHWORDS : COSTS - respondent to Appeal obtained order revoking leave to appeal (and to cross-appeal) where the questions in the appeal lacked utility because respondent had commenced second proceedings in District Court - each party had contributed to procedural miscarriages - each party to pay own costs. LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act 1988 s.52(1A) & s.53 DECISION : Each party to pay own costs - see Para 18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40623/01 DC 8446/98 SHELLER JA HODGSON JA BRYSON J
Monday 19 November 2001 PROKART RACING PTY LTD v. RAJU SHAKYA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate