NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 40 ACSR 521 (2002) 20 ACLC 360
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Australian Innovation Limited v. Ronald John Dean-Willcocks and Ors [2001] NSWSC 1204 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 5953/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 December, 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 December 2001
Australian Innovation Limited - Plaintiff Ronald John Dean-Willcocks & Ian James Purchase as Joint Administrators of Powerline GES Pty Ltd - First Defendant PARTIES : Powerline GES Pty Limited - Second Defendant CMC Power Systems Ltd - Third Defendant Powerline GES, Inc - Fourth Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
P.K. Andronos - Plaintiff COUNSEL : M. Cashion SC, P. Parker - First and Second Defendants P. Stern (Sol) - Third Defendant Aitken McLachlan & Thorpe - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang - First and Second Defendants Ernst & Young Law - Third Defendant CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - ADMINISTRATION - Whether appointment of administrators under s.436C(1) Corporations Act by a chargee is a step in the enforcement of the charge for the purposes of s.267(1). LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act - Part 5.3A, s.267, s.435A, s.436C, s.440B, s.440F, s.441A, s.441B, s.447C Companies Code - s.205A. CASES CITED : - 400 Lonsdale Pty Limited v Southern Cross Airlines Limited 10 ACSR 739 - Salcedo v Mawarie Mining Co Pty Limited (1991) 6 ACSR 197 DECISION : Declaration that the appointment of the administrators was valid.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate