NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Michael William Boyle as Executor of the Estate of the late John Patrick Boyle v State of New South Wales [2000] NSWSC 442 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2989/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/05/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 May 2000
PARTIES : Michael William Boyle as Executor of the Estate of the late John Patrick Boyle (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : G F Cohen (Plaintiff) S B Benson (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Hinde & Ginges (Plaintiff) I V Knight Crown Solicitor (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : SUPERANNUATION — Meaning of retrenchment for purposes of the Superannuation Act 1916 as amended in 1987. LEGISLATION CITED : Public Authorities Superannuation Act, s5 Superannuation Act 1916 (NSW), s23(1)(a) and (b) CASES CITED : Australian Workers Union NSW Branch v Roads & Traffic Authority (NSW) (1989) 29 IR 202 DECISION : Termination not a retrenchment within the meaning of s23 of the Superannuation Act, 1916 (NSW)
REVISED — 24 May, 2000 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 2989/99 MICHAEL WILLIAM BOYLE as Executor of the Estate of the late JOHN PATRICK BOYLE Plaintiff STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES Defendant
JUDGMENT — ex tempore 10 May 2000
INTRODUCTION
1 The Plaintiff by a summons claims as Executor of the Estate of the late John Patrick Boyle, a declaration in the following terms: "1. A declaration that the termination on 12 June 1997 of the employment of the Late John Patrick Boyle with the New South Wales Department of Public Works and Services was not a retrenchment within the meaning of Section 23 of the Superannuation Act, 1916 (NSW)."
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate