NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Ayliffe v Commonwealth of Australia [2001] NSWSC 24 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20278/96 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 December 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 February 2001
Rodney Anthony Burt Ayliffe (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Commonwealth of Australia (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Mr M Joseph SC with Mr I Butcher COUNSEL : (Plaintiff)
Mr P Jones (Defendant) James Taylor & Co Myrtleford Vic (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mr C Ktenas Australian Government Solicitor (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Extension of time to commence proceedings - ss 60G and 60I Limitation Act - Voyager/Melbourne collision LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Commonwealth of Australia v Dinnison (1995) 56 FCR 389 Harris v Commercial Minerals Limited (1995-96) 186 CLR 1 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541; 139 ALR 1 BHP Steel (AIS) Pty Limited v Giudice (NSWCA, unreported 7 March 1999) CASES CITED : Commonwealth of Australia v McLean (1996-97) 14 NSWLR 389 Szerdahelyi v Bailey, Ortado v Bailey, Lewis v Bailey (NSWSC, unreported Badgery-Parker J 1 May 1997) Council of the City of Sydney v Zegarac (NSWCA, unreported 26 February 1998) Dow Corning Australia Pty Ltd v Paton, Meares v Paton (NSWCA, unreported 24 April 1998) Fitzgerald v Bankstown City Council (NSWCA, unreported 6 November 1995) Holt v Wynter [2000] 49 NSWLR 148 DECISION : (1) The plaintiff's notice of motion filed 20 March 1996 is dismissed; (2) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate