NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 52 NSWLR 82 125 A Crim R 186
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v MARKULESKI [2001] NSWCCA 290 revised - 19/02/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60678/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 February 2001 1 May 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 August 2001
PARTIES : Regina Tomislav Markuleski JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 201; Grove J at 269; Simpson J at 285; Carruthers AJ at 344
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0367 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL O'Reilly DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Byrne SC / P J D Hamill (Appellant) L M B Lamprati (Crown) SOLICITORS : Graham Howe & Co (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - sexual offences - appeal against conviction - whether five verdicts of guilty returned by the jury unreasonable having regard to one verdict of not guilty - Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 - CRIMINAL LAW - sexual offences - appeal against conviction - directions of trial judge to jury - whether adequate direction relating to relevance of delay in complaint to credibility of complainant - where significant delay between commission of offences and complaint - whether adequate direction given relating to relevance of acquittal on any count to credibility of complainant on all counts - CRIMINAL LAW - sexual offences - appeal against conviction - whether question asked by jury about complainant's motivation for complaint suggested impermissible process of reasoning - where significant delay between commission of offences and complaint - whether trial judge's response to question was adequate. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Mental Health (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1990 Asplin v The Queen (WASCA 26 August 1999 unreported) Balaam v The Queen [2000] WASCA 292 Blight v The Queen [2001] WASCA 122 Crampton v The Queen (2000) 75 ALJR 133 [2000] HCA 60 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 Duniam v R (TASSC 22 September 1997 unreported) Eastough v The Queen (WASCA 12 March 1998 unreported) Ellis v The Queen (WASCA 26 September 1997 unreported) Farrell v R (TASSC 7 June 1996 unreported) Farrell v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 286 Fleming v The Queen (1999) 197 CLR 250 Jaensch v The Queen [2000] WASCA 212 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 KBT v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 417 Kilby v The Queen (1973) 129 CLR 460 King Bull and Marotta v The Queen (WASCA 19 January 1998 unreported) Koury v The Queen (1964) 43 DLR (2d) 637 KRM v The Queen (2001) 75 ALJR 550 [2001] HCA 11 Lajciak v The Queen [1999] NTSC 82 Longman v The Queen (1987) 168 CLR 79 Lucas v The Queen (1970) 120 CLR 171 M (1998) 104 A Crim R 154 M v The Queen (1984) 181 CLR 487 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 Miles v The Queen (WASCA 21 December 1998 unreported) Miles v The Queen [2000] WASCA 364 Osland v The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 Palmer v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1 R v A [2000] QCA 520 R v ACK [2000] NSWCCA 180 R v AG & RJM [2000] NSWCCA 86 R v AM (NSWCCA 2 April 1998 unreported) R v ARD [2000] NSWCCA 443 R v AT [2000] NSWCCA 342 R v Barnett [2000] NSWCCA 283 R v Bell (UKCA 15 May 1997 unreported) R v Britton (UKCA 5 October 2000 unreported) R v C [2000] QCA 385 R v Carbone [2000] NSWCCA 387 R v Cilgram [1994] Crim LR 861 R v Clarke & Fletcher (UKCA 30 July 1997 unreported) R v Crisologo (1997) 99 A Crim R 178 R v Cox [1999] NSWCCA 62 R v D [2000] QCA 417 R v Davies (1985) 3 NSWLR 276 R v Dixon [2001] NSWCCA 39 R v DJK (1997) 96 A Crim R 443 R v DSA [1999] NSWCCA 35 R v E (1996) 39 NSWLR 450 R v F (1995) 83 A Crim R 502 R v G [1998] Crim LR 483 R v Giam (1999) 104 A Crim R 416 R v Girgines (VSCA 26 March 1996 unreported) R v GWB [2000] NSWCCA 410 R v GWM [2001] NSWCCA 267 R v H [2000] 2 NZLR 581 R v Henman [2001] NSWCCA 4 CASES CITED: R v Hilsley [1998] VSCA 143 R v Hunt [1968] 2 QB 433 R v Irvine [1976] 1 NZLR 96 R v J (1994) 75 A Crim R 522 R v J (No 2) [1998] 3 VR 602 R v James [1999] NSWCCA 191 R v JGVR [2001] VSCA 8 R v JJT (NSWCCA 3 December 1997 unreported) R v Johnstone (2000) 112 A Crim R 405 R v Jovanovic (1997) 42 NSWLR 520 R v KCW [1999] NSWCCA 112 R v Kenward [2000] QCA 482 R v KET [1998] VSCA 73 R v Kino and Mete [1997] 3 NZLR 24 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 R v Kiskarpati (NSWCCA 4 November 1998 unreported) R v Knuth (QCA 23 June 1998 unreported) R v KWG [2000] SASC 398 R v Maddox (QCA 4 December 1998 unreported) R v McNamara (QCA 1 December 1998 unreported) R v Meola [1999] NSWCCA 388 R v MFA [2001] NSWCCA 71 R v Miletic [1997] 1 VR 593 R v Mills [2001] NSWCCA 48 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v O (No. 2) [1999] 1 NZLR 326 R v OGD (No. 2) [2000] NSWCCA 404 R v Omarjee (1995) 79 A Crim R 355 R v P [2000] 2 Qd R 401 R v Petterwood (QCA 11 August 1998 unreported) R v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282 R v RAT (2000) 111 A Crim R 360 R v Ritchie [2001] QCA 142 R v Robinson (2000) 111 A Crim R 388 R v R [2000] QCA 27 R v R (D) (1996) 136 DLR (4th) 525 R v RJB [1999] VSCA 188 R v Robinson (2000) 111 A Crim R 388 R v Russell (QCA 24 March 1999 unreported) R v S [2001] NSWCCA 204 R v SAW [2001] NSWCCA 222 R v Steenson [2000] NSWCCA 143 R v T (1999) 74 SASR 486 R v Tee [1999] SASC 352 R v VRJ (NSWCCA 22 November 1996 unreported) R v W (UKCA 30 March 1999 unreported) R v W (1999) 109 A Crim R 51 R v Warner (UKCA 17 February 1997 unreported) R v Watson (1997) 95 A Crim R 98 R v Wells (NSWCCA 17 June 1998 unreported) R v Whitehead [2000] NSWCCA 400 Reppas v The Queen (WASCA 9 December 1998 unreported) RM v The Queen (WASCA 23 February 1999 unreported) Spiteri v The Queen [2001] WASCA 82 Strickland v The Queen [2000] WASCA 68 Wheeler v The Queen (WASCA 20 April 1998 unreported) Williams v R [2000] TASSC 182 Wimbridge v The Queen [2000] WASCA 117 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Convictions quashed; 3. New trial ordered.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate