NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 121 A Crim R 426
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Speeding, Bradley Adam [2001] NSWCCA 105 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60851/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 21 March 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 March 2001
PARTIES : R v Bradley Adam SPEEDING JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 35; Simpson J at 36
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/21/0205 & 00/21/0264 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Phegan DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R Cogswell SC& B Baker - Crown C Craigie - Respondent SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor - Crown Sydney Regional Aboriginal Corporation Legal Service - Respondent CATCHWORDS : SENTENCING - Crown appeal - six robberies armed with a knife in the space of six months - failure to give sufficient weight to multiplicity of offences and fact two were committed while on bail - failure to give sufficient weight to serious impact on victims - lack of reasonable proportionality between objective gravity of offences and subjective matters - sentences increased. R v Allpass (1994) 73 A Crim R 561 R v Bavadra (2000) NSWCCA 292 CASES CITED: R v Dodd (1991) 57 A Crim R 349 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Richards (1982) 2 NSWLR 464 R v Wheeler (2000) NSWCCA 34 DECISION : Appeal upheld. Five of six sentences quashed and in lieu respondent sentenced in manner described in para [31] as altered in the addendum in para [35]. Orders made in accordance with short minutes.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CCA 60851/00 DC 00/21/0205 & 00/21/0264
GILES JA WOOD CJ at CL SIMPSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate