NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Greater Building Society Limited v Ljubisa Ristic [2001] NSWSC 1052 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10306/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 29-30 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 November 2001
PARTIES : Greater Building Society Ltd (Plaintiff) Ljubisa Ristic (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Newman AJ at 1
COUNSEL : M.A. Jones (Plaintiff) R.M. Lovas (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Clayton Utz (Plaintiff) Harvey Law Firm (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Contract - unjust at time of entry - unfairness - unconscionability - Duty of care - breach - Default - whether default fee was a penalty - foreseeability - Contracts Review Act 1980 ss 7(1), 9(2) LEGISLATION CITED : Contracts Review Act 1980 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Car Co Ltd [1915] AC 79 Bridge v Campbell Discount Company Ltd [1962] AC 600 AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin & Anor (1986) 162 CLR 170 West v AGC Advances Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 CASES CITED : Westpac v Gordon & Reilly (unrep, SCNSW 1 Apr 93) Conley v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2000] NSWCA 101 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Cohen (unrep, SCNSW, Cole J, 22 Jul 88) Elders Rural Finance v Smith (1996) 41 NSWLR 296 Mahlo v Westpac Banking Corporation (unrep, NSWSC, Santow J, 6 Feb 98) Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40 DECISION : para 42
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate