NSW Caselaw
(2000) 10 BPR 18,721 Reported Decision : [2001] ANZ ConvR 586 (2001) NSW ConvR 55-959
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : PINK v CUMMINGS [2000] NSWSC 1114 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4877 of 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/11/2000 and 10/11/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 December 2000
PARTIES : Frederick Thomas Pink & Anor v Russell Ralph Cummings & Anor JUDGMENT OF : Master Macready at 1
COUNSEL : Mr K. Morrissey for plaintiffs Mr J.A.. Trebeck for defendants SOLICITORS : Turnbull Hill Lawyers, for plaintiff Attwaters, Newcastle for defendants CATCHWORDS : Real Property. Restrictive covenants. Application under s 89 of the Conveyancing Act. Whether proposed modifications to the front of a house will reduce the views enjoyed by the next door property which has the benefit of the covenant. Held that there would be an impairment. Cross claim dismissed. Re Alexandra (1980) VR 55 at 57; TZ Developments P/L v Rickman P/L unreported 27.8.93; In Re Ghey and Galton's Application (1957) 2QB 650; Stannard v Issa (1987) AC 175 at 187; Heaton v Loblay (1960) SR (NSW) 332; CASES CITED : Morpath Pty Ltd v ACT Youth Accomm. Group Inc 1987 16 FCR 325 at 338; Webster v Bradac 5 BPR 97430; Re Stani (SC Vic) Full Court 7.12.76; Coles Myer NSW Ltd v Dymocks Book Arcade Pty Ltd unreported 28.6.96;; Heaton v Loblay (1960) SR (NSW) 332 at 335; Morpath P/L v ACT Youth Accommodation Group Inc 1987 16 FCR 325; Durack v De Winton 9 BPR 97721. DECISION : Para 37
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate