NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2000) 34 ACSR 737 (2000) 18 ACLC 665
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Winpar Holdings Limited v Goldfields Kalgoorlie Limited [2000] NSWSC 728 revised - 26/07/2000 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3125/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 14/07/00, 17/07/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 July 2000
In the matter of Goldfields Kalgoorlie Limited (ACN 009 712 092) and the Corporations Law PARTIES : Winpar Holdings Limited (ACN 003 035 523) (Plaintiff) Goldfields Kalgoorlie Limited (ACN 009 712 092) (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
S Blanks (Sol.) (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : M Oakes, SC (Defendant) K Cuneo (ASIC) (Amicus Curiae) SOLICITORS : Stephen Blanks & Associates (Plaintiff) Allen Allen & Hemsley (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Selective reduction of capital having same economic effect as takeover to eliminate minority — Is there need for entirely separate meeting of holders of shares to be cancelled — Need for scheme of arrangement and relevance if at all of Gambotto principles — meaning of "fair and reasonable" to shareholders "as a whole" in s256B of Corporations Law — Whether any special value from acquiring 100% should have been allocated exclusively to the minority or other than pro rata — Is there guidance from s667C of the Corporations Law — Valuation of gold mining company — Treatment of hedge book — Economic upside — Adequacy of disclosure — Any "dealing" in shares when shares cancelled — Relevance if any of divergent commercial interest of largest minority shareholder with preponderance of minority votes — Stock market price not determinative of what is fair and reasonable in particular circumstances of trading. Companies (NSW) Code 1981, s123 LEGISLATION CITED : Company Law Review Act 1998 Corporations Law Part 2J.1, s256A, s256B and s256C, s411, s663B, s664C, s665B, s667A, s667C of Ch 6A , s701, s1322, s1324 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s52 Re Advance Bank Australia Ltd (1996-97) 22 ACSR 513 Re Albert Street Properties Ltd (1997) 23 ACSR 318 Boland v Yates Property Corporation Pty Ltd (2000) 74 ALJR 209 Catto v Ampol Ltd (1989) 7 ACLC 717 Commonwealth v Milledge (1953) 90 CLR 157 Fraser v NRMA Holdings Ltd (1995) 55 FCR 452 CASES CITED : David Grant & Co Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (HC) (1995) 13 ACLC 1572, 18 ACSR 225 Gambotto v W C P Limited and Anor [1994-1995] 180 CLR 432 Holt v Cox (1994-1995) 15 ACSR 313 Melcann Ltd v Super John Pty Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 92 Nicron Resources Ltd v Catto (1992) 8 ACSR 219 Re Shine Fisheries Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 627 Thornett v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 59 CLR 787 Re Tiger Investment Company Limited (2000) 33 ACSR 437 DECISION : Injunction denied.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate