NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lysmar Pty Ltd v Lee [2000] NSWSC 662 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4972/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/06/2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 June 2000
Lysmar Pty Limited (P) Desmond Lee (D1) Theo Kapeleris (D2) PARTIES : Zbyslaw Stanislaw Najdzion (D3) Bruce Michael Wood (D4) Christopher Milledge (D5) Ian Napier (D6) JUDGMENT OF : Young J
P O'Loughlin (P) COUNSEL : D Smallbone (D1, 3 & 4) C Adamson (D2) D Pritchard (D5 & 6) Gordon & Johnstone (P) SOLICITORS : G J Gooden (D1, 3 & 4) Phillips Fox (D2) Henry Davis York (D5 & 6) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE [620]- Costs- Unnecessary costs- Defendants sued jointly- No apparent reason for separate representation- Counsel restricted roles in cross-examination- One set of costs only normally allowed PROCEDURE [666]- Security for costs- Plaintiff trustee for discretionary trust- Ordinarily expected to provide security. Boswell v Coaks (1887) 36 Ch D 444 Bull v West London School Board (1876) 34 LT 674 De Burgh v Chichester (1870) 19 WR 221 Eden v Naish (1878) 7 Ch D 781 Glen v The Union Trustee Co of Australia Ltd (1936) 54 CLR 463 CASES CITED : Greedy v Lavender (1848) 11 Beav 417; 50 ER 878 Hughes v Key (1855) 20 Beav 395; 52 ER 655 Lowndes v Robertson (1819) Madd 465; 56 ER 776 Read v Chown (1929) 46 WN (NSW) 154 Remnant v Hood (No 2) (1860) 27 Beav 613; 54 ER 243 Sunday Times Newspaper Co Ltd v McIntosh (1933) 33 SR (NSW) 371 Woolley v Colman (1882) 21 Ch D 169 DECISION : See paras 35 & 36
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate