NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Woolage v The State of New South Wales [2001] NSWCA 256 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40736/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 July 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 August 2001
PARTIES : Robert Henry Woolage The State of New South Wales JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Stein JA at 54
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 91/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Goldring DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: L King SC/G Waugh Respondent: D Nock SC/W Auston SOLICITORS : Appellant: Lough & Wells Respondent: Hunt & Hunt CATCHWORDS : Negligence - Employer duty of care - Assessment of damages for workers compensation - Vicissitudes LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW), ss151(G) and (H) Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 CASES CITED: Wynn v NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 485 Nestle v McDougall (unreported, New South Wales Court of Appeal, 24 June 1998) Sullivan v Gordon (1999) 47 NSWLR 319 DECISION : Appeal allowed; Respondent to pay the appellant's costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40736/00 HANDLEY JA BEAZLEY JA STEIN JA
Wednesday, 15 August 2001 WOOLAGE v THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES
FACTS The appellant sustained injury in two separate but identical incidents when a desk chair mounted on castors moved away from him as he was about to sit down and he fell on the floor.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate