NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Moores Corporation Australia Pty Limited v Sung [2000] NSWSC 679 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2156/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 22, 27 and 29 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 July 2000
PARTIES : Moores Corporation Australia Pty Limited (P) Chin-Chien Sung (D) JUDGMENT OF : Master McLaughlin
COUNSEL : Mr E. White (P) SOLICITORS : D. G. Thomas Solicitors (P) Phillip Bushby International Lawyers (D) CATCHWORDS : Corporations Law - Application to set aside statutory demand - Genuine dispute about existence or amount of debt - Offsetting claim, and quantification thereof. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law CASES CITED : Mibor Investements Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1993) 11 ACSR 362 DECISION : See paragraph 30.
SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
MASTER McLAUGHLIN
Friday, 14 July 2000
2156 of 2000 MOORES CORPORATION AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED -v- CHIN-CHIEN SUNG (AKA KING SUNG) JUDGMENT
1 MASTER: By summons filed on 17 April 2000 the plaintiff, Moores Corporation Australia Pty Limited, seeks substantively an order that the statutory demand served upon it by the defendant, Chin-Chien Sung, be set aside. 2 That statutory demand is dated 24 March 2000, and requires payment by the plaintiff to the defendant of the sum of $411,183.21. That sum is described in the schedule as follows: Amount paid by the Creditor to the Debtor Company on 30 July 1997 pursuant to written agreement of that date $350,000.00 Payments due by the Debtor to the Creditor from 30 July 1997 to 31 December 1999 pursuant to such written agreement $ 84,583.33 $433,583.33 Less payments made by the Debtor Company to the Creditor from 30 September 1997 to 9 April 1999 -$ 23,400.12 TOTAL DUE $411,183.21
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate