NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : IDOPORT PTY LIMITED & ANOR v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LIMITED & 8 ORS; IDOPORT PTY LTD "JMG" & MARKET HOLDINGS PTY LTD v DONALD ROBERT ARGUS; IDOPORT PTY LTD "JMG" v NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD [14] [2000] NSWSC 1141 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50113/98; 50026/99; 3991/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/11/00, 4/12/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 December 2000
Idoport Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Market Holdings Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) National Australia Bank Limited (Defendant) Donald Robert Argus (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Einstein J
COUNSEL : JJ Garnsey QC, RC Titterton, R Alkadamani (Plaintiffs) JR Sackar QC, JA Halley (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Withnell Hetherington (Plaintiffs) Freehill Hollingdale & Page (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Practice and Procedure - Case Management - Commercial List Practice - "Enough is Enough" proposition - Expert advice as to foreign patent law - need to specially plead foreign law - Practice and Procedure - Discretion to permit amendment of pleadings - Principles Applicable thereto - Justice Paramount consideration - Just, Quick and Cheap resolution of disputes LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act, 1969 Ascherberg, Hopwood & Crew Ltd v Casa Musicale Sonzogno Di Pietro Ostali SNC [1971] 1 WLR 1128 Clough v Rogers (1974) 48 ALJR 481 at 482 CASES CITED : Cropper v Smith (188 4) 2 6 CH D 700 per Bowen LJ at 710 State of Queensland v J L Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 189 CLR 146 Teague v Jones [1925] VLR 205 at 207 DECISION : Leave to amend allowed on terms
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate