NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2001) 19 ACLC 855
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Buddies Liquor P/L v Wah Lai Investment (Australia) P/L [2001] NSWSC 337 revised - 1/05/2001 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2112/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 April 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 April 2001
PARTIES : Buddies Liquor Pty Limited ACN 002 402 191 (Plaintiff) Wah Lai Investment (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 003 169 497 (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : M Christie / Ms V Culkoff (Plaintiff) N Banfield (Solicitor) (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Meers & Meers (Plaintiff) Sally Nash & Co (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Withdrawal of statutory demand directed wrongly against the Plaintiff company — Policy of statutory regime — Costs awarded in favour of Plaintiff. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Law s459E; s459G CASES CITED : Winning Appliances Pty Limited v St George Appliances Pty Limited (Bergin J [1999] NSWSC 1157, 30 November 1999, unreported) DECISION : Costs awarded to party setting aside statutory demand.
REVISED — 1 May, 2001 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 2112/01 Buddies Liquor Pty Limited ACN 002 402 191 Plaintiff Wah Lai Investment (Australia) Pty Limited ACN 003 169 497 Defendant
JUDGMENT — ex tempore 30 April 2001
orders
1. By consent, I order that the Statutory Demand of the Defendant and subsequently purportedly withdrawn, be set aside to the extent that an order to that effect is required
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate