NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : ANGLISS v URQUHART [2001] NSWCA 441 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40873/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 November 2001
PARTIES : William Arthur Angliss - Claimant Alison Mary Urquhart and Andrew Roderick Urquhart - Opponents JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Beazley JA at 24; Stein JA at 25
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT 2648/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Windeyer J and Barrett J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : S D Rares SC/M A Gilmour - Claimant R S Angyal - Opponents SOLICITORS : Deacons - Claimant Whittens - Opponents CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - order under Part 25 Rule 5 of Supreme Court Rules - whether a medical examination can be ordered - where evidence is sought for purpose of challenging the testamentary and legal capacity of the person examined - exercise of discretion set aside LEGISLATION CITED : Guardianship Act 1987 Cox v The State of Queensland [2000] QSC 220 CASES CITED: Prescott v Bulldog Tools Limited [1981] 2 All ER 869 In re the Will of F B Gilbert (deceased) (1946) 46 SR (NSW) 318 DECISION : 1 Leave to appeal granted; 2 Appeal upheld; 3 Vacate the order made on 16 October 2001 by Barrett J; 4 The opponents to pay the costs of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40873/01 ED 2648/01 SHELLER JA BEAZLEY JA STEIN JA Friday, 30 November 2001 ANGLISS v URQUHART
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate