NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : R v GALLAGHER [2001] NSWSC 462 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 70080/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 26/03/2001, 27/03/2001, 28/03/2001, 29/03/2001, 30/03/2001, 30/04/2001, 02/05/2001, 04/05/2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 May 2001
PARTIES : REGINA v Gerard Joseph GALLAGHER JUDGMENT OF : Barr J at 1
COUNSEL : Crown: P Barrett Accused: R Greenwood QC, P Young SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor Accused: Paton Lawyers CATCHWORDS : Evidence - whether evidence of DNA test results was based on the witness' specialised knowledge based on training, study and experience - Held: Yes. - Evidence - whether evidence of DNA test results had substantial probative value - Held: Yes. - Evidence - whether admission of evidence of DNA test results gave rise to danger of unfair prejudice to accused - Held: No. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) ss 70, 79, 135, 137 R v Argue, District Court of New South Wales, Nader ADCJ, QC, 1 March 2001, unreported Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals (1993) 509 US 579 Frye v United States 293 F 1013 (1923) R v Gilmore [1977] 2 NSWLR 935 CASES CITED : HG v R [1999] HCA 2 Idoport Pty Limited v National Australia Bank [1999] NSWSC 828 R v Karger Supreme Court of South Australia, Mullighan J, 29 March 2001, unreported R v Pantoja (1996) 88 A Crim R 554 Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37 Perpetual Trustee Co Limited v George, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division, Einstein J 1 December 1997, unreported DECISION : Evidence held admissible
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate