NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : South Sydney Council v Walsh (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 111 HEARING DATE(S) : On written submissions JUDGMENT DATE : 22 May 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Foster AJA at 17; Bell J at 18 DECISION : The appellant to pay the costs of the appeal on an indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS : COSTS - Indemnity costs in appeals - Offer of compromise - Part 19A of the District Court Rules - General principles applicable to indemnity costs in appeal. ND LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules, Pt 52A r 22(4) District Court Rules, Pt 19A Diamond v Simpson (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 78 Ettingshausen v Australian Consolicated Press Limited (1995) 38 NSWLR 404 CASES CITED : Fotheringham v Fotheringham (No 2) (1999) 46 NSWLR 194 Gray Constructions Pty Ltd v Hogan (No 2) [2000] NSWCA 68 Huntsman Chemicals Co Australia Ltd v International Pools Australia Ltd (1995) 36 NSWLR 242 Moore v Woodforth (No 2) [2003] NSWCA 46 PARTIES : South Sydney Council (Appellant) William J Walsh (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40501/02 COUNSEL : G Curtin (Appellant) J Poulos QC/H Silvester (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox (Appellant) Sparke Helmore (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 5709/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Coorey DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40501/02 DC 5709/98
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate