NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Purcell & Anor v Cruising Yacht Club of Australia & 2 Ors [2001] NSWSC 926 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20473 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 October 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 2001
MONDAY 15 OCTOBER 2001
RICHARD GORDON PURCELL (First Plaintiff)
ALLURE MARKETING PTY LIMITED (Second Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
CRUISING YACHT CLUB OF AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED (First Defendant)
JOHAN CHRISTIAN HUGO van KRETSCHMAR (Second Defendant)
PETER HALLAM BUSH (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
T Tobin Q.C. P Gray (Plaintiffs) COUNSEL : W H Nicholas Q.C. T Blackburn (Defendants) Berne Murray & Tout (Plaintiffs) SOLICITORS : Corrs Chambers Westgarth (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : On application to tender transcript of video tape LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Buck v Jones & Ors (Barr J, unreported, 15 June 2000) CASES CITED : Goldsworthy v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 90 Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 87 Vacik Distributors Pty Limited v ABC & Anor (Sperling J, unreported, 14 November 1999) DECISION : See paragraph 12
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate