NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 54 NSWLR 612
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Harrison v Schipp [2002] NSWCA 78 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40814/01; 40728/98; 40761/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 March 2002, 15 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 June 2002
George Andrew Harrison PARTIES : Emibarb Pty Limited v Delcie Joan Schipp & Ors JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Giles JA at 134; Ipp AJA at 204
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Reference under SCR Pt 12 r 2 LOWER COURT EQ 6425/91 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Not Applicable JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : S J Gageler SC/G Lucarelli (Plaintiffs) M J Slattery QC/J M Hennessy/S Fendikian (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron (Plaintiffs) Dibbs Barker Gosling (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - solicitors - business dealings with clients - EQUITY PROCEDURE - bill of review for fresh evidence - whether still available - EVIDENCE - requirements for fresh evidence - PROCEDURE - court has no power to reconsider perfected judgments - SOLICITORS - business dealings with clients Equity Act 1880 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Equity Act 1901 Judicature Act 1873 (UK) Supreme Court Act 1970 Ainsworth v Wilding [1896] 1 Ch 673, 676, 677 Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93, 104 Akins v National Australia Bank (1994) 34 NSWLR 155, 160 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300, 310 Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529, 530 Barbon v Searle (1686) 1 Vern 416 Barnsley v Powell (1748) 1 Ves Sen 119, 120, 284 [27 ER 930, 1034], 1034; Belt's Supp 74, 143; 28 ER 460, 482 Birne v Hartpole (1717) 5 Bro PC 197, 200 [2 ER 624, 626] Boswell v Coaks (No 2) (1894) 6 R 167, 86 LT 365 n HL, 168 (366), 169-70 (366), 170 (366), 171 (367) Braddock v Tillotson's Newspapers Ltd [1950] 1 KB 47 CA, 50 Brown v Higgs (1803) 8 Ves 561, 563, 566 [32 ER 473, 474, 475] Builders Licensing Board v Sperway Constructions (Syd) Pty Ltd & Anor (1976) 135 CLR 616, 619, 620 Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 164 CLR 502, 504-5 Charles Bright & Co Ltd v Sellar [1904] 1 KB 6, 11, 12-13 CDJ v VAJ (No 1) (1998) 197 CLR 172, 201-2 Coal and Allied Operations Pty Limited v Australian Industrial Relations Commission & Ors (2000) 203 CLR 194, 202, 203 Commonwealth Bank v Quade (1991) 178 CLR 134 Cotter v Barrymore (1733) 4 Bro P C 203 Council of the City of Greater Wollongong v Cowan (1955) 93 CLR 435 Davies and Cody v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170, 183 DJL v The Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226, 244, 245, 247 Doherty v Liverpool District Hospital (1991) 22 NSWLR 284 Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 11, 24-26, 33 Ex parte Currie; re Dempsey (1968) 70 SR 1 Ex parte James (1803) 8 Ves 337 [32 ER 385], 345 [388] Falke v The Scottish Imperial Insurance Company (1887) 57 LT 39, 40 Flower v Lloyd (1877) 6 Ch D 297, 300, 302 Friesen v Braun [1926] 2 WWR 257 Gamser v The Nominal Defendant (1977) 136 CLR 145, 153, 154 Head v Godlee (1859) 1 Johns 536 [70 ER 534] (538-9, [535]) (578, [550]) Hip Foong Hong v H Neotia & Co [1918] AC 888, 894 Hosking v Terry (1862) 15 Moore PC 493, 504 [15 ER 581, 585] Hungate v Gascoyne (1846) 2 Ph 25; 41 ER 850 (26; 851) Huskisson RSL Sub-Branch Club Ltd v Sullivan (1990) 20 NSWLR 332 In re Barrell Enterprises [1973] 1 WLR 19, 24, 25-27 In re Harrison's Share Under a Settlement [1955] Ch 260, 276 In re Scott & Alvarez's Contract [1895] 1 Ch 596, 610, 623 In re Scott & Alvarez's Contract [1895] 2 Ch 603 CA In re St Nazaire Co (1879) 12 Ch D 88, 91, 92, 93, 96-7, 98, 99-100, 100-101 In re Suffield and Watts Ex parte Brown (1888) 20 QBD 693, 696, 697, 698 CASES CITED: Ivanhoe Gold Corporation Ltd v Symonds (1906) 4 CLR (Pt 1) 642, 670-1 Jonesco v Beard [1930] AC 298, 301-2 Jopp v Wood (1865) 2 De G J & S 323, 326, 329 [46 ER 400, 401, 402] Law Society of New South Wales v Harvey [1976] 2 NSWLR 154, 171 Maybery v Brooking (1855) 7 De G M & G 673: 2 Jur.N.S.76 McCann v Parsons (1954) 93 CLR 418 McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529, 535, 542, 543, 544 McGowan v Middleton (1883) 11 QBD 464, 468 Mickelberg vThe Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 Minister for Lands and Forests v McPherson (1990) 22 NSWLR 687 M'Laughlin v Little in (1845) Reserved and Equity Judgments 19, 21 Monroe Schneider Associates (Inc) v No 1 Raberem Pty Limited (No 2) (1992) 37 FCR 231, 234, 238-240 Moore v Moore (1755) 2 Ves Sen 596, 598 [28 ER 380, 382] Nintendo Company Limited v Centronics Systems Pty Limited (1994) 181 CLR 134, 168 Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133 Oldham v Stonehouse (1838) 3 M & C 317 Orr v Holmes & Anor (1948) 76 CLR 632 O'Rourke v Hoeven (1974) 1 NSWLR 622, 626 Parker v McKenna (1874) LR 10 Ch App 96, 118, 124-5 Partridge v Usborne (1828) 5 Russ 195 Perry v Phelips (1810) 17 Ves Jun 173, 178 [34 ER 67, 69], 177-8; 68-9, Preston Banking Company v William Allsup & Sons [1895] 1 Ch 141, 143, 144-5, 282, 283 Quilter v Mapleson (1882) 9 QBD 672, 676 Re May (1883) 25 Ch D 231, (1885) 28 Ch D 516 CA Ronald v Harper (1913) VLR 311, 318 R v Flower (1966) 1 QB 147, 150-1, 183 R v Wallis (1949) 78 CLR 529, 550 Salt v Cooper (1880) 16 ChD 544 Smith v NSW Bar Association (No 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256, 265 Spies v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 24 NSWLR 691 Taylor v Lawrence [2002] 2 All ER 353 CA The Queen v Gaudron (1978) 141 CLR 204 Thomas v Rawlings (No 3) (1864) 34 Beav 50, 53-4; 55 ER 551, 552 Thomson Australian Holdings Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1981) 148 CLR 150, 161 Toubia v Schwenke [2002] 54 NSWLR 46 Tyrrell v Bank of London 10 HLC 26 [11 ER 934], 39-44 (939-941) Victorian Stevedoring and General Contracting Company Pty Limited v Dignan (1931) 46 CLR 73, 108-9 Wentworth v Rogers (No 5) (1986) 6 NSWLR 534 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (No 2) (1982) 149 CLR 672 White v Ivory (1910) reprinted from The Times [1922] 1 WWR 1222 Willan v Willan (1810) 16 Ves 72 [ 33 ER 911] DECISION : Proceedings dismissed with costs.; Direct that these orders be entered forthwith.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate