NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Wrigley v Holland [2002] NSWCA 109 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40585/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 May 2002
THE WRIGLEY CO PTY LTD PARTIES : v KYLIE HOLLAND JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 29; Ipp AJA at 30
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Compensation Court LOWER COURT CC 52701/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Walker CCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - J D Hislop QC/N E Chen Respondent - R Goodridge SOLICITORS : Appellant - Price Waterhouse Coopers Legal Respondent - Firths The Compensation Lawyers CATCHWORDS : WORKERS COMPENSATION ACT - section 40 - weekly compensation - effect of worker's pregnancy - discretion - PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) Australian Wire Industries Pty Limited v Nicholson (1985) 1 NSWCCR 50 Stead v State Government Insurance Commission (1986) 161 CLR 141 Morgan v Commissioner for Railways (1972) 46 WCR 33 CASES CITED: Myer Sydney Ltd v Buckley [1980] 54 WCR 319 Hirst v Illawarra Area Health Service (2000) 21 NSWCCR 82 Kesen v Luke Singer Pty Limited (1989) 18 NSWLR 566 NRMA Insurance Ltd v B & B Shipping and Marine Salvage Co Pty Ltd (1947) 47 SR (NSW) 273 DECISION : Appeal allowed - orders made
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40585/01 CC 52701/00 HANDLEY JA HODGSON JA IPP AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate