NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : CONCRITE PTY LTD v ROGERSON [2002] NSWCA 310 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40978/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 September 2002
PARTIES : Concrite Pty Ltd - Appellant Bruce Rogerson - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Young CJ in Eq at 27
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 4578/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Gibb DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J D Hislop QC/N C Chen - Appellant P Webb QC/S Stewart- Respondent SOLICITORS : Sparke Helmore - Appellant Rishworth Dodd & Co - Respondent CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - causation - internal inconsistencies in trial Judge's reasoning - many contributing factors - misapplication of onus of proof - failure to give reasons - assessment of damages - new trial ordered LEGISLATION CITED : Workers Compensation Act 1987 Workers Compensation (Benefits) Amendment Act 1991 CASES CITED: Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Set aside the verdict and judgment for the respondent given and entered by her Honour Judge Gibb on 26 November 2001; 3. Remit the proceedings to the District Court for a new trial limited to the question of damages; 4. Judgment for the appellant by way of restitution in the amount of $141,000 paid by the appellant to the respondent as a term of the stay of execution of the judgment together with interest thereon from the date of payment to the date of repayment; 5. The respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 if so qualified; 6. The costs of the first trial be in the discretion of the Judge who hears the new trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate