NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Overton Investments Pty. Ltd. v. Cuzeno RVM Pty. Ltd. [2003] NSWCA 27 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Stein JA at 2; Hodgson JA at 3 DECISION : See par.[70] of judgment
CATCHWORDS : MORTGAGES - Remedies of mortgagor - Redemption - Construction of mortgage - Whether contingent or future debts secured - Costs - When mortgagee loses entitlement. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court rules Pt.52A r.42 Bank of New South Wales v. O'Connor (1889) 14 App.Cas. 273 Bird v. Wenn (1886) 33 Ch.D. 215 Charles v. Jones (1885) 35 Ch.D. 544 Cotterell v. Stratton (1872) 8 Ch.App. 295 Cotterell v. Stratton (1872) LR 8 Ch.App. 295 Credland v. Potter (1874) 10 Ch.App. 8 CASES CITED : Heath v. Chinn (1908) 98 LT 855 ICT Pty. Ltd. v. Sea Containers Pty. Ltd. (1995) 39 NSWLR 640 Kinnaird v. Trollope (1889) 42 Ch.D. 610 National Provicial Bank of England v. Games (1886) 31 Ch.D. 582 Project Research Pty. Ltd. v. Permanent Trustee of Australia Ltd. (1990) 5 BPR 11,225 Rourke v. Robinson [1911] 1 Ch. 480 Watts, In Re (1882) 22 Ch.D. 5 Webb v. Crosse [1912] 1 Ch. 323 PARTIES : Overton Investments Pty. Ltd. - appellant Cuzeno RVM Pty. Ltd. - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40330/02 COUNSEL : Mr. J.T. Gleeson SC with Mr. A.J. McInerney for appellant Mr. R.G. Forster SC with Mr. T.G.R. Parker for respondent SOLICITORS : Gadens, Sydney for appellant Michie Shehadie & Co. for respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate