NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Papandony and Another v Citibank [2002] NSWSC 388 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 50148/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/04/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 14 May 2002
Steven Papandony - 1st Plaintiff PARTIES : Gannemon Pty Ltd - 2nd Plaintiff Citibank Limited - Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Gzell J
COUNSEL : B R McClintock SC with Kate Trail for the plaintiffs S Epstein SC for the defendant SOLICITORS : Deacons Lawyers Christopher Levingston & Associates Solicitors CATCHWORDS : CHEQUES- bearer cheques crossed "not negotiable" - drawing procured by fraud - no concluded contracts - drawer remains true owner entitled to immediate possession - third party deposits permitted by bank - conversion - deposit not authorised by senior executive contrary to standard procedure - bank fails to establish it acted without negligence - statutory defence fails - bank allows drawings on customer account before notice of fraud - change of position and acting to detriment relevant to voidable transactions but not to void transactions - formal submission that contributory negligence a defence to conversion. LEGISLATION CITED : Cheques Act 1986 (Cth) Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliott (1946) 47 CLR 204 at 229 Lloyds Bank v The Chartered Bank of India Australia and China [1929] 1 KB 40 Marfani & Co Ltd v Midland Bank Ltd [1968] 1 WLR 956 at 970-971 Bute (Marquess) v Barclays Bank Ld [1955] 1 QB 202 at 211 Hunter BNZ Finance v ANZ Banking Group [1990] VR at 46 North and South Wales Bank v Macbeth [1908] AC 137 Midland Bank Ld v Reckitt [1933] AC 1 Great Western Railway Co v London and County Banking Co Ld [11901] AC 414 Morison v London County and Westminster Bank Ld [1914] 3 KB 356 Lloyds Bank Ld v Chartered Bank of India, Australia and China [1929] 1 KB 40 Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd v State Bank of Victoria [1989] VR 617 Hunter BNZ Finance v ANZ Banking Group [1990] VR 41 Ludbroke Co v Todd (1914) 30 TLR 433 Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 App Cas 459 at 461 Tate v Wilts and Dorset Bank (1899) 1 Legal Decisions Affecting Banker 286 CASES CITED : Holland v Russell 4 B & S 14 (122 ER 365) Harrisons Group Holdings Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1989) 51 SASR 36 Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v C G Maloney Pty Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 420 Orix Australia Corporation Ltd v M Wright Hotel Refrigeration Pty Ltd (2000) 155 FLR 267 Associated Midland Corporation Ltd v Bank of New South Wales [1983] 1 NSWLR 533 Associated Midland Corporation Ltd v Bank of New South Wales (1984) 51 ALR 641 State Bank of New South Wales v Midland Credit Ltd, unreported, Court of Appeal, 16 July 1984 Commissioners of the State Savings Bank of Victoria v Permewan Wright & Co Ltd (1914) 19 CLR 457 at 467 Bavins, Junr & Sims v London South Western Bank [1900] 1 QB 270 Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd v Westpac Banking Coproration (1987-1988) 164 CLR 622 David Securities Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991-1992) 175 CLR 353 Nemur Varity Pty Ltd v National Australia Bank Ltd [1999] VSC 342 Wilton v Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia [1973] 2 NSWLR 644 Day v Bank of New South Wales (1978) 18 SASR 163 Grantham Homes Pty Ltd v Interstate Permanent Building Society Ltd (1979) 37 FLR 191 Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd v Commissioners of the State Bank of Victoria [1989] VR 617 DECISION : See par 43
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate