NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : SHARVINE PTY LTD v BRIDGE & MARINE ENGINERING PTY LTD [2001] NSWSC 833 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2969/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 September 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 21 September 2001
PARTIES : Sharvine Pty Limited ACN 080 518 396 (Plaintiff) Bridge and Marine Engineering Pty Limited ACN 059 317 396 (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
COUNSEL : B. Coles QC (Plaintiff) W. Stark (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Cowley Hearne (Plaintiff) Clayton Utz (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Application to set aside demand - test establishing genuine dispute - low threshold - nature of the evidence - must be more than mere assertion - failure to join joint creditors - whether a mere defect LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act ss 459E, 459H, 459J Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACSR 785 Re Morris Catering (Australia) Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ACSR 601 Chadwick Industries (South Coast) Pty Ltd v Condensing Vaporisers Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 37 CASES CITED : Edge Technology v Lite-On Technology Corporation (2000) 34 ACSR 30 Frederico's Restaurant v Warwick Entertainment (1995) 18 ACSR 702 Manzo v 555/225 Pitt Street Pty Ltd (1990) 2 ACSR 809 Re A & K Holdings Pty Ltd [1964] VR 257 DECISION : para 24
IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
ACTING MASTER BERECRY
FRIDAY, 21 SEPTEMBER 2001
2969/00 – SHARVINE PTY LTD v
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate