NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : WATERHOUSE v WAUGH [2003] NSWCA 139 HEARING DATE(S) : 12 and 13 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Giles JA at 57; Young CJ in Eq at 58 DECISION : Appeal allowed in part. Orders made
CATCHWORDS : LANDLORD & TENANT - assignment of accrued rights of lessor - concurrent lease - Conveyancing Act s 117 - contrary intention - LANDLORD & TENANT - covenant to deliver vacant possession at end of lease - substantial quantity of rubbish left on premises - breach of covenant LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act Blake v Shaw (1860) Johnson 732 Blane v Francis [1917] 1 KB 252 CA Cole v Kelly [1920] 2 KB 106 CA Cook v Taylor [1942] Ch 349 Cumberland Consolidated Holdings Ltd v Ireland [1946] KB 264 CA Dalegrove Pty Limited v Isles Parking Station Pty Limited (1988) 12 NSWLR 546 Fitzgerald v Masters (1956) 95 CLR 420 CASES CITED : Horn v Beard [1912] 3 KB 181 London & County Ltd v W Sportsman Ltd [1971] Ch 764 CA Nicolene Ltd v Simmonds [1953] 1 QB 543 CA Rye v Purcell [1926] 1 KB 446 Savage v Dent (1737) 2 Strange 1064; 93 ER 1034 Smilie Pty Ltd v Bruce (1998) 9 BPR 16,723 Warren v Keen [1954] 1 QB 15 CA Yarmouth v France (1887) 19 QBD 647 CA CHARLES HERCULES WATERHOUSE & ORS PARTIES : v WILLIAM MONTAGUE WAUGH & ANOR FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41000/01 COUNSEL : Appellants: N A Cotman SC/S E Torrington Respondents: G C Lindsay SC/F D Curtis Appellants: Waterhouse Solicitors SOLICITORS : Respondents: Freehill Hollingdale & Page
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate