NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Allban & Sons Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) [2002] NSWSC 870 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4634/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 17 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 September 2002
PARTIES : Allban & Sons Pty Limited (Administrator Appointed) (P) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : J T Johnson (P) SOLICITORS : Tress Cocks & Maddox (P) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS [176] - Voluntary administration - General power to make orders - Power of Court to make such order as it thinks appropriate. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 439A(3)(b), 447A & 1322 CASES CITED : Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brien (2000) 200 CLR 270 DECISION : Order made dispensing with advertisement of second creditors' meeting.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
TUESDAY, 17 SEPTEMBER 2002
4634/02 ALLBAN & SONS PTY LIMITED (ADMINISTRATOR APPOINTED) JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: This is an application made by a company in administration under s 447A, alternatively s 1322, of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("the CA"). The order asked for is in effect a dispensation with the requirement of s 439A(3)(b) of the CA to cause a second creditors' meeting of a company in administration to be advertised. It seems to me that I shall not need to resort to the provisions of s 1322; this is an order that can be made under the principles discussed in Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brien (2000) 200 CLR 270. 2 The facts in this case are that the administrator has made a report, the company is hopelessly insolvent and has been so since well back into 2001. The administrator's recommendation is that it be resolved that the company be placed in liquidation. If that resolution is not passed at this meeting, there is still a winding up application outstanding. Unfortunately, however, in the meantime the administration would come to an end and the control of the company pass back to a sole director who is himself an insolvent under administration. The only disadvantage of the dispensation sought is that the advertisement will not have been published in the usual course. However, about 15 creditors of the company were present at the first creditors' meeting and a larger number of the creditors of the company have been circulated with the administrator's report and notice of this meeting. 3 Under the circumstances it seems to me that, although some other interested person might attend as a result of an advertisement, there has been substantial notification of the meeting to interested persons. I could, of course, extend the time within which the meeting might be convened, so that it could be adjourned and an advertisement published. However, in the circumstances I have set out, there seems little point in this and it would cause further monies to be expended to that little point. 4 In the circumstances, at approximately 2.30 pm today, I have made the order which was sought, the meeting having been notified to commence at 2 pm.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate