NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Sarma v The Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Ltd [2002] NSWCA 93 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40352/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2002
PARTIES : Vimala Sarma (Appellant) The Federal Capital Press of Australia Pty Limited (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; Santow JA at 24; Ipp AJA at 36
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT CL 20390/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Grove J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C A Evatt (Appellant) B A M Connell (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Ward Maxwell & Co (Appellant) Minter Ellison (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : DEFAMATION - libel - published review of dance performance - jury finds imputation established but not defamatory - whether finding of jury perverse Defamation Act 1974, s 7A - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Defamation Act 1974, s 7A Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) Browne v Agar (1928) 138 LT 698 Buck v Jones [2002] NSWCA 8 Cairns v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd (1983) 2 NSWLR 708 Carr v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1944] 2 All ER 163 Cinevest Ltd v Yirandi Productions Ltd (2001) ATR 81-610 Duplany v Davis (1886) 3 TLR 1184 CASES CITED: Greek Herald Pty Ltd v Nickolopoulos [2002] NSWCA 4 Hocking v Bell (1942) 42 SR(NSW) 130 Hopwood v Muirson (1945) KB 313 Mechanical & General Inventions Co v Austin [1935] AC 346 Mularczyk v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 467 Prestia v Aknar (1996) 40 NSWLR 165 Young v Wicks (1986) 13 FCR 85 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate