NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Elmir; R v Salami [2003] NSWCCA 192 HEARING DATE(S) : 2 July 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 July 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Dowd J at 32; Adams J at 2 DECISION : In respect of Elmir: Count 1 -Sentence below quashed. Substituted therefor a sentence of two years to commence on 28 February 2003 with a non-parole period of one year; Count 2 - A fixed term of imprisonment of nine months to commence on 28 February 2003 to be served concurrently; In respect of Salami: Count 1 - The sentence below be quashed. Substituted therefor a term of imprisonment of one year and nine months with a non parole period of nine months. Count 2 - A fixed term of imprisonment of nine months. Both sentences to commence on 28 February 2003.
CATCHWORDS : Sentence - Crown appeal - home invasion - payback for attack on young brother of one offender - whether mitigation - periodic detention increased to full time imprisonment LEGISLATION CITED : s5D of the Criminal Appeal Act, 1912 ss 44, 88 and 89 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act, 1999 The Crown (Appellant) Fawaz Mohammed Elmir (Respondent) PARTIES : The Crown (Appellant) Jamal Salami (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60090/03; 60091/03 COUNSEL : G I O Rowling (Crown) J Dailly SC (Respondents) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) James A Hall (Respondents)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/0263 & 02/21/0264 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT English DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate