NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Robinson [2002] NSWCCA 359 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60679/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 June 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 September 2002
PARTIES : R v Christopher Andrew Robinson JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA; Dunford J; Greg James J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70051/99 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Adams J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : T J Golding - Appellant Dr P J Power - Crown SOLICITORS : D J Humphreys - Applicant S E O'Connor - Crown CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - murder - offender aged 17 - would be worst case but for age - sentence of 45 years with 35 years non-parole period - whether error in finding no remorse - no error - whether error in not reducing sentence by virtue of plea of guilty - no error - whether sentence manifestly excessive - gravity of crime and need for protection of public - consideration of protection of public - need for protction properly founded in evidence - no appealable error as to head sentence - weighing of factors different for non-parole period - special circumstances - appealable error as to non-parole period. D. Bugmy v The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525; Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321; Power v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 623; R v Costen (1989) 11 Cr App R (S) 182, R v Crump (CCA, 30 May 1993, unreported); R v Elemes [2000]NSWCCA 235; R v Fernando; R v Fernando (1977) 95 A Crim R 533; R v GDR (1994) 35 NSWLR 376; R v Glen [1999] NSWSC 1018; CASES CITED: R v Harrison (1997) 93 A Crim R 314; R v Leonard (CCA, 7 December 1998, unreported); R v Purdey (1992) 65 A Crim R 441; R v Simpson (2001) 53 NSWLR 704; R v Stabler (1984) 6 Cr App R (S) 129; R v Thomson; R v Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383; R v Tran [1999] NSWCCA 109; Siganto v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 656; Veen v The Queen (No 1) (1979) 143 CLR 458; Veen v The Queen (No 2) (1988) 164 CLR 465. DECISION : Grant leave to appeal, uphold the appeal, confirm the head sentence, but quash the non-parole period and in lieu thereof fix a non-parole period of 27 years to date from 22 January 1999. The earliest date on which the applicant will be eligible for release on parole is 21 January 2026.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate