NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Karki [2002] NSWCCA 67 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60025/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 31 October 2001 1 November 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 March 2002
PARTIES : Regina Ivesh Karki JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Hulme J at 88; Barr J at 100
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70214/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Studdert J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: G Smith Karki: P Boulten SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor Karki: Glen K Walsh CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Appeals - appeal against conviction - whether proviso applies under s 6(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) RPS v R (2000) 199 CLR 620 Azzopardi v R (2001) 75 ALJR 931 R v Giri [2001] NSWCCA 197 R v Storey (1978) 140 CLR 364 CASES CITED: Wilde v R (1988) 164 CLR 365 R v Bozzola [2001] NSWCCA 8 Stingel v R (1990) 171 CLR 312 Masciantonio v R (1995) 183 CLR 58 R v Green (1997) 191 CLR 334 Zecevic v DPP (1987) 162 CLR 645 DECISION : Appeal dismissed
IN THE COURT of CRIMINAL APPEAL
CCA 60025/00 BEAZLEY JA HULME J BARR J
Monday, 18 March 2002 REGINA v Ivesh KARKI
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate