NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Loretta Ann PICONE & Ors v Stephen John KIRKBY [2002] NSWSC 1233 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3563/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/12/2002 to 12/12/2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 December 2002
Loretta Ann Picone - first plaintiff PARTIES : Nicola Picone Kirkby - second plaintiff Marlow Robert Picone Kirkby - third plaintiff Stephen John Kirkby - defendant JUDGMENT OF : Acting Master Berecry at 1
COUNSEL : Mrs M. Gilmour - plaintiffs Mr P. Hallan, SC/J. Viney - defendant SOLICITORS : Stewart Cuddy & Mockler - plaintiffs L.D. Rogers - defendant CATCHWORDS : Large estate - de facto spouse - long & happy relationship - adequacy of provision - role as single mother - whether provision should enable plaintiff to remain out of the workforce until children complete secondary education - community expectations - competing claims - elderly mother - step siblings - primary duty of testator to spouse - children - no provision - reliance on cost of living report - provision for private education. LEGISLATION CITED : Family Provision Act 1982 Bosch v Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (1930) AC 463 Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 CASES CITED : Anasson v Phillips, unreported, Young J, 4.3.88 Gardiner v Gardiner, unreported, Santow J, 28.5.88 Marshall v Carruthers (2002), NSWCA 47, Hodgson AJA Blackmore v Allen (2000) NSWCA 162, Sheller JA DECISION : Refer para. 51.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate