NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : JOHNSON v ALEXANDER [2002] NSWSC 824 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20340 OF 2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 September 2002
NOEL PATRICK JOHNSON (Plaintiff)
v
COLIN J ALEXANDER PARTIES : (First Defendant)
LIDOFORM PTY LTD (Second Defendant)
VIEBELL PTY LTD (Third Defendant)
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
C Robinson (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : K Rees (First Defendant) Powrie & Co (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jaques (First Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Service of Statement of Claim - interstate (ACT) - Supreme Court Rules Pt 11 r 8(1)(c) - Service and Execution of Process Act (Cth) 1992 - declaration LEGISLATION CITED : Service and Execution of Process Act (Cth) 1992 Supreme Court Rules Pt 11 r 8(1)(c) CASES CITED : Highfield Woods Pty Ltd v Bayview Crane Hire Pty Ltd (1996) 14 ACLC 599 Roladuct Spiral Tubing Pty Ltd v C & P Trading Pty Ltd [1994] 2 Qd R 247 DECISION : See paragraph 23
DLJ:1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION list
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
11 SEPTEMBER 2002
20340 OF 2002
NOEL PATRICK JOHNSON (Plaintiff)
v
COLIN J ALEXANDER (First Defendant)
LIDOFORM PTY LTD (Second Defendant)
VIEBELL PTY LTD (Third Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate