NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v G.A.R. [2003] NSWCCA 224 HEARING DATE(S) : 9/7/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Bell J at 2; Miles AJ at 3 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence refused
CATCHWORDS : Evidence of complaint in sexual cases - inconsistent verdicts LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 319 Buckland v R [1977] 2 NSWLR 452 Carr v The Queen (1988) 165 CLR 314 Crampton v the Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161 Doggett v the Queen 2001) 208 CLR 343 Dyers v The Queen (2002) 192 ALR 191 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 CASES CITED : Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 McKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 R v BWT [2002] NSW CCA 60 R V GS [2003] NSW CCA 73 R v Markuleski (2001) NSWCCA 290, 2001 52 NSWLR62 PARTIES : Regina G.A.R. (Appellant) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60125/03 COUNSEL : DML Woodburne (Crown) C Papanyanni (Appellant) SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor Jeffreys & Associates (Appellant)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 02/21/1183 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Naughton DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate