NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 136 A Crim R 127
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Micallef [2002] NSWCCA 480 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60348/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 4 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 December 2002
PARTIES : Regina (NSW) Alan George Micallef - Appellant JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Dunford J at 10; Bell J at 53
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 02/21/3016 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Stewart ADCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Barrett - Crown P Byrne SC - Appellant SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor - Crown DJ Humphreys - Appellant CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - proof - circumstantial evidence - totality of circumstances - appeal - whether verdicts unreasonable Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Reg v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729 R v Filippetti (1978) 13 A Crim R 335 Azzopardi v The Queen [2001] HCA 25, 205 CLR 50 Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45, 192 ALR 181 CASES CITED: R v Gordon (1991) 57 A Crim R 413 Plomp v The Queen (1963) 110 CLR 234 Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367 Knight v The Queen (1992) 175 CLR 495 Chamberlain v The Queen [2] (1984) 153 CLR 521 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Sobolewski (unreported - CCA - 17 June 1998) DECISION : (By majority) Appeal dismissed, convictions confirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60348/02
SULLY J DUNFORD J BELL J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate